I haven't actually tried this yet, but I mostly just wanted to show that oneTBB does in fact live in pkgin. Not for all the platforms NetBSD supports, but for sure amd64.

https://pkgsrc.se/parallel/threadingbuildingblocks

The server sends ActionType = 0, this creates a not big enough buffer which causes the error.

This can be circumvented by making 0 = an invalid ation, but circumventing problems is not a good way to do stuff.

Faulting code:

nation.cpp:90

    if(pop.type_id == POP_TYPE_FARMER
    || pop.type_id == POP_TYPE_SOLDIER
    || pop.type_id == POP_TYPE_LABORER
    || pop.type_id == POP_TYPE_SLAVE) {
        return current_policy.poor_flat_tax * base_tax;
    }

Right now if somehow SoE gets ported to a MIPS machine and then i try to connect to a x86 box i will surely get a lot of errors regarding endianess in the serializer.

Anything higher than 2.2+ would suffice - the current client code heavily relies on GL lists and state-machine stuff that would surely cause issues when trying to port to a newer environment.

Basically the client would supply the server an image of the user along with the username, this should be required before being able to select a country.

This could be used by the server to identify and also ban/kick users.

Users can have any username they want - even duplicate usernames - provided that there isn't another user with the same name on the server we want to connect to.

• Fixed east-to-west wrapping.
• Added river penalty modifier (both when moving into or out of a river), currently it doubles the cost.
• Fixed issue with multiple copies of the same tile in the priority queue.

gs.right_side_panel being closed by the x button does not properly set gs.right_side_panel to nullptr

Instead of deleting it we should just hide/show the different panels.

• [x] Have POPs be aligned to certain ideologies (which would be a pointer, nullptr to indicate no alignment)
• [x] Each policy change would decrease/increase militancy on POPs whose views aligns most or less with those of the changed policy
• [x] A revolt due to an ideology shift resets militancy of the new ruling ideology's followers and gives them 5.0 life satisfaction and 5.0 everyday satisfacion and 5.0 luxury satisfaction to all of them, while the others have an increase, depending on how radical where the political changes
• [ ] Parliament should be an insitution where aristocrats elect/reject bill propositions who aligns with their views, aristocrats with low con would accept almost any policy the player proposes, while high con aristocrats would reject, and may try to impose their own
• [ ] Executive parliament is just a version of the parliament for stuff like declarations of war or treaties or building stuff and etc
• [x] State coups which basically would overthrow the goverment without a civil war and have the same effects as a won revolt
• [ ] 3-way or even 4-way civil wars, where the countries would have a ref_name of country_name+n, where +n is an integer that would be allocated by the server when a new party comes - when a +n postfix nation stops existing it should be removed immediately from the game - the game due to the way the engine works would treat these civil war nations as independent nations so it means they can ally with foreingers